Reinforcement Learning Infrastructure

Enterprise RL Environments for AI Labs

We build high-fidelity reinforcement learning environments that mirror real Fortune 500 enterprise challenges — so AI labs can train models that actually work in the real world.

$B+
Annual Lab Spend on Training Data
F500
Enterprise Pattern Depth
Rollouts Per Environment

01 — The Problem

AI labs need enterprise data.
They can't get it.

Enterprise IP Walls

Fortune 500 companies will not share codebases, internal tooling, or implementation data. IP protection and privacy policies make direct collection impossible.

Vendor Data Is Low Quality

Large vendors focus on volume over depth. Their environments are generic and don't capture the complexity of real enterprise implementations.

Open Source Is Contaminated

GitHub is already scraped by every lab. Open source is in pre-training data and doesn't represent how closed enterprise projects actually work.

Product Deployment Has Limits

Even when labs deploy coding tools, enterprise customers don't opt in to data collection. The most valuable training signal stays behind corporate firewalls.

The Gap

Nobody is creating high-fidelity environments that represent what it's actually like to implement technology at a Fortune 500 company. That's where we come in.

02 — Core Insight

Environments beat traces. Every time.

Environments

What labs buy
  • Reusable — generate infinite traces from a single environment
  • Models run hundreds to thousands of rollouts, exploring solutions humans would never consider
  • Mirrors RL breakthroughs from DeepMind — models discover novel strategies through exploration
  • Docker image + codebase + verification script = complete training loop
  • Premium pricing — AI labs pay significantly more for environments than any other data type

Static Traces

Mostly obsolete
  • One-time snapshots — once collected, you cannot generate more data
  • Constrains the model to follow a human's path instead of exploring freely
  • Models are now better than most humans — why constrain them?
  • Not scalable — you need enormous quantities and they still run out
  • Labs almost never pay for trace data anymore

03 — Our Edge

We know what enterprise actually looks like.

Fortune 500 Pattern Depth

Years of implementation experience across the world's largest enterprises. We've seen the patterns in financial services, healthcare, pharma, industrial, and legal — patterns that don't exist on GitHub.

Synthesis, Not Exfiltration

We never use customer data directly. Instead, we synthesize environments based on cross-industry patterns we've observed. What implementing XYZ looks like, what challenges you encounter.

Out-of-Distribution Value

Open source is in-distribution — labs already train on it. Our environments are genuinely out-of-distribution: proprietary patterns, enterprise complexity, real-world constraints no scraper can capture.

Domain Coverage

Financial ServicesHealthcare & PharmaEnterprise MigrationsComplex IntegrationsRegulatory ComplianceIndustrial OperationsInsuranceLegal Tech

04 — The Product

Sandboxed environments ready for RL.

Docker-Based Sandboxes

Self-contained Docker images that spin up realistic enterprise codebases. Each environment represents a specific implementation challenge with all dependencies and constraints in place.

Verification Scripts

Automated reward signals that validate whether the model completed the task. Binary pass/fail for RL training loops — reward 1 for success, 0 for failure.

Domain-Specific Tasks

Technology implementations, platform migrations, system integrations, compliance workflows — the high-value enterprise tasks that AI labs desperately need coverage for.

Infinite Rollout Capacity

Each environment supports thousands of independent rollouts. Labs train many model variants, letting each explore different solution paths until they discover what works.

Target buyers: AnthropicOpenAIxAIGoogle DeepMindMeta AIFrontier Labs

05 — Target Verticals

Deep in domains that matter most.

01Financial Services
Trading platformsCompliance systemsRegulatory reportingRisk modelingPayment processing
02Healthcare
EHR integrationsHIPAA-compliant systemsClinical data pipelinesHL7/FHIR interfaces
03Enterprise Migrations
Legacy modernizationCloud migrationsPlatform transitionsData warehouse moves
04DevOps & Infra
CI/CD pipelinesMulti-cloud deploymentsObservability stacksIaC automation

06 — Market Context

A hot market with a quality gap.

Existing Players

  • Scale AI — broad training data, RLHF, evals
  • Surge AI — high-trust RLHF, Anthropic partner
  • Labelbox — instruction tuning, SFT, RLHF
  • Appen — domain-expert RLHF across verticals
  • Turing — proprietary human data for SFT/DPO
  • Mercor, Datacurve — emerging vendors

Why There's Room

  • Big vendors focus on scale, not domain depth
  • Generic environments don't capture enterprise complexity
  • Niche domain-specific data commands premium pricing
  • Labs spending aggressively on RL environments right now
  • DPO/RFT reduce need for basic labels but increase need for rich environments

07 — How It Works

From patterns to product.

01

Identify Patterns

Catalog enterprise implementation patterns from years of Fortune 500 consulting engagements across financial services, healthcare, and industrial verticals.

02

Synthesize Environments

Build Docker-based sandboxed codebases that mirror real enterprise challenges. No customer data — only cross-industry patterns synthesized into realistic scenarios.

03

Add Verification

Create automated scripts that validate task completion — the reward signal for RL training. Binary pass/fail enables clean reinforcement learning loops.

04

Sell to AI Labs

Labs run their models through our environments thousands of times. Models explore, fail, learn, and eventually master enterprise-grade tasks.

08 — Deep Dive

Building a sandbox: Trading Platform

Example EnvironmentImplement a Real-Time Order Matching Engine at a Tier-1 Bank

What's Inside the Docker Image Sandbox

A realistic enterprise codebase — not a toy project. Enterprise patterns, legacy constraints, real dependencies.

trading-platform/ src/ order-service/ # Java 17 + Spring Boot matching-engine/ # C++ core, JNI bridge risk-gateway/ # Pre/post-trade risk checks market-data-feed/ # FIX protocol adapter settlement/ # T+1 settlement service infra/ docker-compose.yml # Kafka, Postgres, Redis k8s-manifests/ # Prod-like deployment config/ regulatory-rules.yaml # MiFID II / Reg NMS risk-limits.json # Position & exposure caps tests/ integration/ # Existing test suite load/ # Gatling perf tests

The Task Prompt What the model sees

A natural-language task — the same kind of work request a senior engineer would get.

TASK: The matching engine currently processes orders sequentially. Implement a concurrent order matching system that: 1. Supports limit and market orders across multiple symbol books in parallel 2. Maintains price-time priority within each book 3. Enforces pre-trade risk checks against risk-limits.json before matching 4. Publishes matched trades to the Kafka "trades" topic in FIX-compliant format 5. Passes all existing integration tests 6. Handles > 10,000 orders/sec on the load test without degradation

Verification Script Reward Signal

Automated checks that produce the binary reward. Model gets 1 only if ALL gates pass.

#!/bin/bash — verify.sh GATE 1: Compilation mvn clean compile -q && g++ -O2 src/*.cpp GATE 2: Unit Tests mvn test — 147 existing tests must pass GATE 3: Integration Tests docker-compose up -d && run suite GATE 4: Regulatory Compliance assert FIX format on trades topic assert MiFID II fields present GATE 5: Performance gatling load test > 10k orders/sec p99 latency < 5ms RESULT: ALL PASS = reward 1 ANY FAIL = reward 0

Why This Is Valuable Complexity

What makes this different from open-source toy problems.

MULTI-LANGUAGE Java + C++ + YAML + SQL + Bash JNI bridge between services ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE Kafka event streaming PostgreSQL with schema migrations Redis caching layer Kubernetes deployment configs REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS MiFID II / Reg NMS compliance Pre-trade risk limits Audit trail requirements REAL-WORLD TRADEOFFS Concurrency vs correctness Latency vs risk validation Backward compatibility with tests # None of this exists in GitHub repos. # This is what enterprise actually is.

09 — The RL Loop & Next Steps

How an AI lab uses this environment.

Spin UpFresh Docker container
Model WorksReads, edits, runs commands
VerifyAll 5 gates checked
ScoreReward 1 or 0
ResetDestroy, fresh start

Repeat 100s–1000s of times. Different approaches each run — different concurrency strategies, data structures, architectural decisions — until the model masters the task.

The window is now.

AI labs are investing aggressively in RL training environments. This window won't last forever. We need to move fast.

Immediate

Catalog Enterprise Patterns

Extract common implementation patterns from Fortune 500 engagements.

Near-term

Build First Environments

Start with financial services. Build 10–20 Docker-based environments with verification scripts.

Go-to-Market

Approach AI Labs

Pilot with 1–2 frontier labs. Prove our niche environments beat generic vendor data.